Pros and Cons of Settling a Personal Injury Case Out of Court

Pros and Cons of Settling a Personal Injury Case Out of Court

Personal injury case

Deciding whether to settle a personal injury case out of court or take it to trial is a major decision. It depends on the nature of the case, as well as personal preferences. However, most personal injury cases settle out of court before reaching trial.

In an “out of court” settlement, the defendant or defendant’s insurance company offers a settlement to the plaintiff in exchange for a release of liability. There are advantages and disadvantages of settling a case before trial. An experienced personal injury attorney can evaluate your case to determine the option with the best outcome.

Below are the pros and cons of settling a case outside of court:

Pros:

  • Saves Time : Settling a case before trial is quicker. Often, trials begin a year after the initial claim is filed. The whole process may take up to three years or even longer, depending on the complexity of the case and the jurisdiction.
  • Reduced stress : Settling a personal injury case out of court is less stressful and burdensome. An offer is negotiated, the defendant makes the settlement and the case is resolved. On the other hand, trials can be stressful for all the parties involved. It requires several court appearances, as well as being subjected to examination and cross-examination. In addition, a cross-examiner attempts to undermine a person’s credibility in public.
  • Privacy : In a settlement, the details are kept confidential, unlike a trial where all the case details become public record.
  • Less expensive : Trials can be very costly. The attorney fees are high when the case goes to trial compared to settling out of court.  Besides high attorney fees, expenses can increase considerably after paying expert witnesses, court costs, administrative fees, travel, etc.
  • Predictability : An experienced lawyer can predict the outcome of a settlement better than jury decisions.
  • No record of guilt : Unlike trials, an out of court settlement, does not require the defendant to admit his or her wrongdoing. However, in a trial the defendant has to plead “guilty” or “not guilty.”

Cons

  • Less compensation : The monetary award offered in a settlement may be much lesser than a court trial. However, the value of the settlement must be weighed against the risk of going to court as well as the increased costs.
  • Punitive damages : Oftentimes, out of court settlements do not cover punitive damages, such as emotional suffering.

Contact the Robert P. Ianelli Law Firm

Experienced personal injury attorneys at the Robert P. Ianelli Law Firm, understand the pros and cons of settling your case out of court. We can advise you on the best way to proceed with your claim. Call us today at 877-891-2773/845-202-9700.

Share via:

No Comments Yet.

Leave a reply